Biography of Chiang Kai-shek

Chiang Kai-shek (1887 to 1975), also known as Generalissimo, was a Chinese political and military leader who served as head of the Republic of China from 1928 to 1949. After being forced from power and exiled by Chinese Communists after World War II, he continued to serve as president of the Republic of China on Taiwan. Fast Facts: Chiang Kai-shek Also Known As: GeneralissimoKnown For: Chinese military and political leader from 1928 to 1975Born: October 31, 1887 in Xikou, Zhejiang Province, ChinaDied: April 5, 1975 in Taipei, TaiwanParents: Jiang Zhaocong (father) and Wang Caiyu (mother)Education: Baoding Military Academy, Imperial Japanese Army Academy Preparatory SchoolKey Accomplishments: Along with Sun Yat-sen, founded the Kuomintang (KMT) political party. In exile, Director General of the Kuomintang government on TaiwanMajor Awards and Honors: Recognized as one of the Big Four allied victors of WWIISpouses: Mao Fumei, Yao Yecheng, Chen Jieru, Soong Mei-lingChildren: Chiang Ching-kuo (son), Chiang Wei-kuo (adopted son)Notable Quote: â€Å"There are three essential factors in all human activity: spirit, materials, and action.† In 1925, Chiang succeeded Sun Yat-sen as leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party, known as the Kuomintang, or KMT. As head of the KMT, Chiang expelled the communist arm of the party and succeeded in unifying China. Under Chiang, the KMT focused on preventing the spread of Communism in China and fighting increasing Japanese aggression. When the United States declared war on Japan in 1941, Chiang and China swore their allegiance and assistance to the Allies. In 1946, Communist forces led by Mao Zedong, a.k.a. Chairman Mao, overthrew Chiang and created the People’s Republic of China. From 1949 until his death in 1975, the exiled Chiang continued to lead the KMT government in Taiwan, recognized by the United Nations as the legitimate government of China. Early Life: Chinese Revolutionary Chiang Kai-shek was born on October 31, 1887, in Xikou, a town now in the Zhejiang province of the People’s Republic of China, to a well-off family of merchants and farmers. In 1906, at age 19, he began his preparations for a military career at the Paoting Military Academy in North China, later serving in the Japanese army from 1909 to 1911, where he adopted the Spartan ideals of the Japanese Samurai warriors. In Tokyo, Chiang fell in with a group of young revolutionaries plotting to overthrow China’s Qing dynasty ruled over by the Manchu clan. Chinese political and military leader Chiang Kai-shek (1887 - 1975), circa 1910. FPG / Getty Images When the Qing Revolution of 1911 broke out, Chiang returned to China where he took part in fighting that succeeded in overthrowing the Manchus in 1912. With the fall of China’s last dynastic order, Chiang joined with other republican revolutionaries to oppose former Qing dynasty general Yuan Shikai, China’s new president, and eventual emperor. Association With Sun Yat-sen After an attempt to overthrow Yuan Shikai failed in 1913, Chiang helped found the Kuomintang (KMT) party. Largely withdrawing from public life from 1916 to 1917, he lived in Shanghai where he reportedly belonged to an organized financial crime syndicate known as Qing Bang, or Green Gang.  Returning to public life in 1918, Chiang began a close political association with influential KMT leader Sun Yat-sen. Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek speaking at meeting of Chinese National Assembly. A picture of the father of Chinese Democracy, Dr. Sun Yat-Sen, behind him. The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images / Getty Images Attempting to reorganize the KMT along communist lines, Sun Yat-sen sent Chiang to the Soviet Union in 1923 to study the policies and tactics of its Red Army. After returning to China, he was appointed as commandant of Whampoa Military Academy near Canton. As Soviet military advisers streamed into Canton to teach at Whampoa, Chinese communists were admitted into the KMT for the first time. Anti-Communist Leader of the KMT When Sun Yat-sen died in 1925, Chiang inherited leadership of the KMT and began trying to stem the rapidly growing influence of the Chinese communists within the party without losing the support of the Soviet government and military. He succeeded until 1927, when in a violent coup, he expelled the communists from the KMT and quashed the Chinese labor unions they had created. Hoping his communist purge would please U.S. President Calvin Coolidge, Chiang succeeded in establishing closer relations between China and the U.S. government.   Chiang now continued to reunify China. As supreme commander of the Nationalist revolutionary army, he directed massive attacks against northern tribal warlords in 1926. In 1928, his armies occupied the capital in Beijing and established a new Nationalist central government in Nanking headed by Chiang. The Xian Incident and World War II In 1935, even as the Empire of Japan threatened to occupy Northeast China, Chiang and his KMT continued to focus on fighting Communists within China rather than the external threat of the Japanese. In December 1936, Chiang was seized by two of his own generals and held hostage in China’s Xian Province in an attempt to force the KMT to change its policies regarding Japan. Held captive for two weeks, Chiang was released after agreeing to actively prepare his armies for war with Japan and to form an at least temporary alliance with the Chinese communists to help fight the Japanese invaders. With the horrific Japanese Rape of Nanking massacre in 1937, all-out war between the two countries erupted. Chiang and his armies defended China alone until 1941, when the U.S. and other Allies declared war on Japan. Post-World War II and Taiwan While China held an honored place among the Big Four allied victors of WWII, Chiang’s government began to decay as it resumed its pre-war struggle against internal communists. In 1946, the civil war resumed and by 1949, the communists had taken control of continental China and established the People’s Republic of China. 1943-Cairo, Egypt: President Roosevelt seated outside during the Cairo Conference with Mr. and Mrs. Chiang Kai Shek, and Winston Churchill. Bettmann Archive / Getty Images Exiled to the province of Taiwan, Chiang, along with his remaining Nationalist forces established a weak dictatorship on the island. Over the next two decades, Chiang reformed his Nationalist Party, and with ample American aid began Taiwan’s transition to a modern and successful economy. In 1955, the U.S. agreed to defend Chiang’s Nationalist government on Taiwan against future communist threats. However, the pact was weakened in the early 1970s by improving relationships between the U.S and the People’s Republic of China. In 1979, four years after Chiang’s death, the U.S. finally broke off diplomatic relations with Taiwan in order to establish full relations with the People’s Republic of China. Personal Life Chiang had four wives during his lifetime: Mao Fumei, Yao Yecheng, Chen Jieru, and Soong Mei-ling. Chiang had two sons: Chiang Ching-Kuo with Mao Fumei, and Chiang Wei-Kuo, whom he adopted along with Yao Yecheng. Both sons went on to hold important political and military positions in the Kuomintang government in Taiwan. Born and raised a Buddhist, Chiang converted to Christianity when he married his fourth wife, Soong Mei-ling, popularly called â€Å"Madam Chiang† in 1927. He spent the rest of his life as a devout Methodist. Death Months after suffering a heart attack and pneumonia, Chiang died of cardiac malfunction and renal failure on April 5, 1975, in Taipei at the age of 87. While he was mourned for over a month on Taiwan, Communist state-run newspapers in mainland China briefly noted his death with the simple headline â€Å"Chiang Kai-shek Has Died.† Today, Chiang Kai-shek is buried along with his son Chiang Ching-Kuo at Wuzhi Mountain Military Cemetery in Xizhi, Taipei City. Sources Fenby, Jonathan (2005). Chiang Kai Shek: Chinas Generalissimo and the Nation He Lost. Carroll Graf Publisher. P. 205. ISBN 0-7867-1484-0.Watkins, Thayer. The Guomindang (Kuomintang), the Nationalist Party of China. San Jose State University.Coppa, Frank J. (2006). â€Å"Encyclopedia of modern dictators: from Napoleon to the present.† Peter Lang. ISBN 0-8204-5010-3.Van de Ven, Hans (2003). War and Nationalism in China: 1925-1945. Studies in the Modern History of Asia, London: RoutledgeCurzon, ISBN 978-0415145718.Teon, Aris. The Green Gang, Chiang Kai-shek, and the Republic of China. Greater China Journal (2018).

Euthanasia Is The Meaning Of Good Death - 1215 Words

Euthanasia has the meaning of â€Å"good death†. Is there really such a thing as someone having a good death? The controversy behind this is active euthanasia is morally wrong. Active euthanasia is usually done to patients who have been diagnosed with a terminal illness and is a way to have an instant death instead of prolonging life. There are some places where euthanasia is already legally admissible, but people are having thought of making this act of killing legal throughout the country. I shall prove to you that actively killing someone is morally worse than letting someone die. Anyone who believes that God exist would agree that no one has the right to play God. No matter how you put it active euthanasia is still a form of murder. Thou shall not kill, I am sure you all have heard of that before. Giving a physician the right to actively kill is giving a person the right to play God. When it is your time to die it is your time to die. We never know what God has in store for us. I have had family members in my family who had terminal illness and fought until God said it was ready for them to come home. My Aunt had was diagnosed with lupus when she was 18. She went on to get married and have two boys. Her lupus took a toll on her body in her 30s, but she still fought to show her kids that you have to fight in life and put your faith in God. Another example of the power of God is my cousin who had breast cancer. The doctor found the cancer while in stage four be she stillShow MoreRelatedEuthanasia And The Right Of Life And Euthanasia1558 Words   |  7 Pages of Right to Life and Euthanasia, first it should be defined by at least two notions: Euthanasia and the Right to Life, the first are definitions as those shown below: Some authors see that the concept or the notion of Euthanasia is too ambiguous, which can lead us to understand very different and even contradictory things. Let s refer to it: 1. A normed use: Death without physical suffering or which causes voluntarily Another use is the Factual painless death or death in a state of graceRead MoreThe Great Debate On Doctor Assisted Suicide Essay1239 Words   |  5 PagesDoctor Assisted Suicide Euthanasia, in today’s world, is a word with opposing meanings. Originally, it meant â€Å"a good death† (Leming Dickinson, 2016). Since the legalization of euthanasia around the world in the early 1990’s, the meaning has changed. Several pro-euthanasia sites would call it a humane and peaceful way to end the dying process, by either stopping the course of treatment or the use of lethal doses of medications (Leming Dickinson, 2016). Con-euthanasia activists are most concernedRead MoreEssay on Euthanasia in Nursing731 Words   |  3 PagesEuthanasia is a term that originated from the Greek language: eu meaning good and thanatos meaning death. Generally, euthanasia implies the intentional termination of life that is initiated by a person who wishes to commit suicide. However, euthanasia has many meanings and as a result, has several terms that define and differentiate various types of euthanasia. For instance, passive euthanasia is altering a form of support thereby hastening the death of a person, i.e. removing life supportRead MoreIs Euthanasia Immoral? Essay1690 Words   |  7 PagesIs Euthanasia Immoral? Mr. Blackburn Inquiry Skills 2 Dec. 1996 In todays society there are many disagreements about the rights and wrongs of euthanasia. Although death is unavoidable for human beings, suffering before death is unbearable not only for terminal patients but for the family members and friends. Euthanasia comes from the Greek word Thanatos meaning death and the prefix eu meaning easy or good (Russell 94). Thus, eu- Thanatos meaning easy or good deathRead MoreEuthanasia For Animals Essays861 Words   |  4 Pages Euthanasia One of the most widely debated topics in the animal industry is euthanasia. The topic of euthanasia causes arguments around the world because the word takes the best of the emotional side of human nature causing the people against euthanasia to feel that it is inhumane, unfair, and a sin to euthanize animals for any reason. In a way these emotional feelings overcome the human mind thus stop them from thinking logically. Even though the word euthanasia can have several meanings throughoutRead MoreShould Euthanasia Be Allowed?1675 Words   |  7 PagesWhen euthanasia comes to mind, what do you think of? Do you think of people hurting, do you think of it as suicide, do you think of sick people? The big question is†¦ do you think it’s wrong? Many questions, concerns, and issues have come up with this topic in the past, because there are so many factors that go into deciding when euthanasia should be allowed, if at all. Should just anyone be allowed to decide they want to die, and have a physician assist him or her with suicide, or do they have toRead MoreThe Controversial Issue Of Euthanasia1680 Words   |  7 PagesEuthanasia For a long time, euthanasia has been a controversial issue in countries all around the globe. However, with active technological progress, this topic becomes more urgent than 50 years ago. Undoubtedly, it is influenced by many factors. One of the leading debatable points is the invention and improvement of artificial life support devices. It is impossible to overestimate the importance of this theme as it is related to the most important value of each person – their life and lives of theirRead MoreShould Euthanasia Be Legalized?864 Words   |  4 Pagesto help them reach to death. Though there are some people disagreeing with animal mercy killing, most of people agree on it and it is legal. However, when it comes to human, there is a furious controversy over euthanasia. Because there is a sharp conflict on the issue, some countries accept mercy killing lawful while others do not. The main arguments about the issue are whether the deliberate intervention on one’s life t o the end is morally right or wrong. Some say euthanasia should be legalized becauseRead MoreIntroduction: . I.Imaging Being Sick For Many Years, Trying1469 Words   |  6 Pagesinnumerably, by prolonging death, but this involves challenging medical ethics. Keeping a large number of very ill people alive with these medical technologies, there is also a possibility of suffering; discomfort and diminished quality of life. III. Physician assisted suicide is the intentional ending of a person’s life to relieve their pain and suffering. Those suffering or non-responsive individuals should have the right to self-determination over their bodies by choosing euthanasia. An individual shouldRead MoreEuthanasia: We Have the Right to Die Essay872 Words   |  4 PagesWhat is euthanasia? The dictionary defines euthanasia as the act of putting to death or allowing to die painlessly, a person or animal from a painful incurable disease. Euthanasia is also known as mercy killing. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek word eu- meaning good and the Greek word thanatos which means death. There are two types of euthanasia: active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a person painlessly. While passive euthanasia is the

Zombie essay free essay sample

Choices, decisions and regret all have a deep meaning and reason behind them. When someone has power it does not give them the right to chose for another, but we forget sometimes that the person means no harm. There can be many theories behind every wrong choice, it can be something we would not like to make, but in order for the sake of humanity. We are scared to tell people that they are infected and instead don’t tell them. Humans are emotional creatures and in our nature it is rude to tell someone you have no hope but to die. We all want a chance to start over but sometimes we don’t get the right choices to make. For example, you are the one in power and are given two choices to help save your people. Option 1 is to tell people that they are plagued by infectious diseases and to let them leave. Option 2 is to hide the fact they are infected and to let them die. Option 1 will save their lives, but the disease will spread and infect everyone even themselves. On the other hand, option 2 will save humanity but the infected group will have to be sacrificed. Which option would you choose? The walking dead episode six â€Å"TS-19† is the last episode of season one which was aired on December 5, 2010. Written by Frank Darabont and directed by Guy Ferland. The key characters in this episode are Rick, Shawn, Lori, Dale and Doctor Edwin Jenner. This episode starts off with an outbreak of zombies on their camp and they have nowhere else to go. Ricky talks to the group about leaving camp as it is no longer safe. Ricky knew that in the city there is a facility named C. D. C that was working on a cure. The group had no chance but to search for this facility, even though they heard a lot of things that C. D. C no longer exists. The group finally decides to travel in the city where C. D. C is their only hope. A far travel ahead of them, thousands of miles away till they reach to the city when the part of Doctor Edwin Jenner arrives. The doctor is alone working in the lab testing the dead zombie TS-19, when all of a sudden he accidently drops a tube filled with viruses and deadly chemicals that he tries to wipe with his gloves, but it’s too late. The doctor has to evacuate the room when the alert goes on and an automated computer repeats â€Å"Alert status, air qualifiers indicate corrosive fumes, all personal must clear the room†. As he bolts out the lab, decontamination occurs which destroys all of his research and â€Å"TS-19† samples. All his hard work is gone which leads him to be depressed with no hope.. The doctor is alone in the medical building with no one to talk to except the computer webcam, until the group finally arrives at C. D. C, which alerts the doctor that survivors are outside. The doctor’s intention was to not let anyone in and was hoping they would just leave, but seeing the group begging to open the door he finally lets them in. The group enters C. D. C, and goes into a blood test demanded by Doctor Edwin Jenner. Later, they enjoy the luxury given a hot shower, wine, meal and learn the story of Jenner. Shane and Lori have an argument which does not end well, and leaves a scratch on Shane’s neck. The next morning Jenner shows the group a video of test subject 19 who was bitten, which he was forced to shoot the patient until Dale notices a clock that is counting to zero which leads the group to slam away with questions. C. D. C is running out of gas and the building is programmed to self destruct by itself. Jenner refuses to open the doors and convinces the group they can have an easy death. Group tries to persuade Jenner to open the doors and the clock is ticking. Jenner finally opens the door and warns them that the main doors are locked in the ground floor. Carol then pulls out a grenade and gives it to Rick, who sets it against the glass and pulls the pin. Two of the group members decide to stay while the rest drive away and are back to reality, facing zombies. As in this episode Doctor Edwin Jenner chooses for the group to die, he convinces to the group that â€Å"you will feel no pain and it will be the end of sorrow, grief and regret†. The group all knew Dr. Edwin had the power to either let them go or stay. Instead the doctor indulges everyone to stay letting them know the disadvantages, that out there is a brutal and agonizing death. Why does he make everyone stay with him to die when he let everyone in C. D. C in the first place? In my opinion I think the doctor realized that there is no hope for them so why not let them die here peacefully. This choice was rather much inhuman and no one was expecting this from Doctor Edwin. This action of Doctor Jenner was a reaction to the earlier choice since he was all alone and after the lab incident he completely changed. As Freud’s theory â€Å"in every man there is beast inside him†. It was as if he became from being humble to the complete opposite. How can someone save your life but in the end act as if he is god and decide your death. Doctor Edwin Jenner might not have done what was morally right, but he may have done what was necessary. He was trying to choose what was best for the group; the doctor didn’t want the survivors to become one of the walkers but instead wanted the rest of them to die without any pain. After much convincing, Jenner opens the gate and whispers in Rick’s ear and I think he says your wife is pregnant†. Since he took the blood test he would know, the reason I think he tells rick so late is because his intention was to not let everyone go. The doctor probably thought he shouldn’t tell Rick since he was going to let them all die. Or instead, Jenner didn’t tell Rick that Lori is pregnant, he told him that everyone is infected and maybe that’s why he refused to open the door. Maybe if he told the group when the clock was clicking that all of you guys are infected and it’s too late to do anything, then I think the group would stay behind and accept their death. Jenner probably didn’t want the group to be disturbed knowing the fact that they are infected and have no choice but to die in C. D. C. There can be many reasons why Jenner didn’t want to open the door. Another theory on the whisper is that: Jenner saw Shane’s â€Å"rape attack† on Lori, when Shane came to her drunk there might be a camera in the recreation room which the Doctor saw, and that could be the whisper in Rick’s ear. I don’t think one should lose hope and commit suicide just because your wife dies. There is always hope we just have to be patient. According to Plato, he attributes that â€Å"To know the good is to do the good† and Jenner had no right to keep all of the people locked up like hostages. However, virtue overcomes his heart and the doctor finally lets them free, but what if they didnt make it out in time? I don’t think his wife would be proud of him for this inhuman selfish act. Although his intention was to let everyone die peacefully, because he knew the zombies will hunt them down sooner or later. The doctor could have tried to come up with a cure, but instead he decided to commit suicide by staying inside the building that was about to blow up. In the episode of â€Å"TS-19† Dr. Edwin Jenner is observing a zombie. This person who was bitten is no ordinary person. It is Dr Edwin Jenner’s wife, the one who ran the facility and was the most important person in the company. How would it feel to be testing your wife who has been bitten by a zombie? I would say that is quite rasping. That is more like a suicide decision; personally if it was my wife I would not be able to handle the pain. In this episode Jenner shoots his wife when she turns into a zombie after waking up from death. He shows a video to the group of the demonstration but doesnt mention it to the group that he had to kill his own wife. The question is why would he hide this decision? Why didn’t he just tell the group in the beginning that the person who was bitten was his own wife? If the group would knew it was Dr Jenner’s wife they wouldnt trust him anymore. If you could have the courage to kill your wife, theres no doubt he would do the same to anyone. In my opinion, I think anyone would have kept that a secret. There was a reason for the doctor to hide that part, how can someone tell a group of strangers that he just killed his own wife, but at the right moment when there is no time. The whole perspective would change if he told them earlier; the people would think he is crazy. In my theory, I think Jenner didn’t want to live because of what happened in the lab incident. It wasn’t just about the important samples he lost but he was testing the samples of TS-19, Jenner accidently spilled some of the test tubes which he tried wiping it with his own hands and he felt a sting on his gloves. His gloves started to melt off his fingers and as he quickly took off the gloves he escaped the laboratory when decontamination occurred. In my theory that was the whole twist of Doctor Edwin Jenner to stay inside the building waiting for the clock to stop along with everyone else. Why would Jenner want to die such a death if he had so many chances to come up with a cure? So I think that’s why he decided to stay behind along with others since he is infected. In my opinion deep down inside, Jenner’s intention was for the well being for everyone because he didn’t want the rest of the group to turn into a zombies. A man must serve humanity and help others no matter what, but we live in a world where people are under a load of obligations of every kind (Auguste Comte). As The great known philosopher Thomas Hobbes, said that the right of nature of each man has to use his own power as he will himself for the preservation of his own nature. The choices made by Doctor Edwin Jenner might not be morally right, but he may have done what was necessary. I do not feel that when he refused to open the doors Jenner’s decision were selfish, cold hearted, or even cruel. He had a tough decision to make, although he did convince them to stay to die, but in the end he did what was the right choice, by letting them go. In my opinion the whisper in Rick’s ear was the whole twist in the episode and the true reasons behind Jenner to not let them go. In my opinion when Rick tells Jenner â€Å"your wife did not have a choice to start over, we do†, that is when Jenner realizes his choice is cruel and selfish.

Symbolism In The Scarlet Letter Essays (542 words) -

Symbolism In The Scarlet Letter Symbolism in The Scarlet Letter The Scarlet Letter is a book of much symbolism. One of the most complex and misunderstood symbols in the book is Pearl, the daughter of Hester Prynne. Pearl, throughout the story, develops into a dynamic symbol - one that is always changing. Pearl came to represent this symbolism in many ways. In The Scarlet Letter, Hester received the scarlet letter, A. She had to wear this letter upon her chest. This was the Puritan way of treating her as an adulteress. The Puritan treatment continued, because as Hester walked through the streets, she was looked down upon as if she were some sort of horrible being that had committed a terrible crime. This would give her much mental anguish and grief. On the other hand, God's treatment of Hester for her sin was quite different than just a physical token: he gave Hester the punishment of a very unique child which she named Pearl. This punishment handed down from God was a constant mental and physical reminder to Hester of what she had done wrong, and she could not escape it. In this aspect, Pearl symbolized God's way of punishing Hester for adultery. The fact that Hester's life was ruined for so long was the ultimate price that Hester paid for Pearl. With Pearl, Hester's life was one almost never filled with joy, but instead a constant nagging. Pearl would harass her mother over the scarlet A which she wore. Pearl would also make her own A to wear, and sometimes played games with her mother's, trying to hit it with rocks. When Hester would go into the town with Pearl, the other children would make fun of her, and Pearl would yell and throw dirt at them. So, in this case, Pearl symbolized the decimation of Hester's life and mental state. Although Hester had so much trouble with Pearl, she still felt that Pearl was her treasure. Pearl was virtually the only thing that Hester had in life, and if Pearl wasn't in Hester's life, Hester would almost surely have committed suicide. Once in a while, Pearl would bring joy to Hester's life, and that helped her to keep on living. Pearl really symbolized a rose to her mother, at some times she could be bright and vibrant, and really love her mother, but at other times, she could be wilting. It was at these times when she was wilting that brought Hester the most grief. One final way in which Pearl symbolized something in the novel was with her association with the scarlet letter. Pearl really was the scarlet letter, because if Pearl had never been born, Hester would have never been found guilty of adultery, and thus never would have had to wear that burden upon her chest. Without that burden, Hester would have led a much better life then the one she had throughout the novel. In closing, Pearl was a source of many different kinds of symbolism. From being a rose, to representing the scarlet letter A, she was a kind of burden, yet love for Hester. And as a final note, Pearl was more then her mother's only treasure; she was her mother's only source of survival. History Essays